Quick answer: yes, Lindt 70% dark compares most closely to Ghirardelli 72% dark, so there's a bit of a discrepancy there before we look deeper.
Unfortunately Ghirardelli doesn't put nutrition facts on their website, so we turn to caloriecount.about.com. Lindt data from product page.
Unfortunately I don't trust CalorieCount info, somehow that bar manages to have 17 g of fat in a 3 g serving? but assuming the rest of the info is correct:
Product | Servings | Fat grams per serving | Protein grams per serving | Carb grams per serving | Fiber grams per serving | Fat grams | Protein grams | Digestible Carb grams | Calories | % fat calories | Ketogenic Ratio |
Ghirardelli 72% dark | 1.0 | 17 | 2 | 17 | 4 | 17 | 2 | 13.00 | 213.00 | 71.83% | 102.27% |
Lindt 70% dark | 1.0 | 19 | 3 | 17 | 3 | 19.00 | 3.00 | 14.00 | 239.00 | 71.55% | 104.76% |
It's about a tie there, depending on if you're going with %fat calories or ketogenic ratio it could fall either way.
No comments:
Post a Comment